Faith and Reason within the Holocaust Essay -- Essays Papers

Faith and Reason within the Holocaust One of the greatest horrors of the 20th Century was the extinction of over 6 cardinal Jews and 5 million others during the Holocaust. In the face of this atrocity many have wondered how such a tragedy transcended in a supposed civilized European society. What role did phantasmal institutions play in the prevention or lack of prevention of the horrors inflicted by the Nazis? How did the German government create, within a reasoning public, acceptance and even corroborate for the extermination of a people who previously were considered equals? The inhumanity of the Holocaust was procured with effective use of propaganda on the German people who were willing to support anyone who could return Germany to the stentorian time prior to World War I. The Holocaust was able to sustain vitality during the war because of the Wests ignorance and indifference of the horrendous reality that was the Holocaust. The off of millions at extermination ca mps such as Auschwitz and Dachau was the end result of a series of events that did not develop through extraordinary circumstances, but rather from an educated German and Western societies abandonment of their responsibility to the minority. Ordinarily, one would expect that any acts of injustice to a person would be found morally wrong by religious institutions. However, in Europe, Jews historically had a difficulty functioning within a Christian society. The vision that people could live together peacefully contempt religious differences was a New World concept that had not found its way into Europe during the 1930s. A great deal of Germanys population was Protestant furthermore, they were Lutherans. As followers of Luthers principles... ... this widespread lack of compassion for the other Jews, the Nazis were able to fulfill one of their goals before their final fallthe extermination of over 75% of the German Jewish population. In the hours before his suicide, Hitler c onsoled himself with this while the rest of the world questioned how such an atrocity had manifested. Endnotes 1. Rita Steinhardt Botwinick, A History of the Holocaust From political theory to Annihilation (Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall, 1996), 19. 2. Adolf Hitler. The Jewish Peril. Rpt. in Rogers, 396. 3. Rita Steinhardt Botwinick, 84. 4. Rita Steinhardt Botwinick, 76. 5. http//serendipity.nofadz.com/cda/niemoll.html 6. Joseph Goebbels. The Jews Are to Blame. Rpt. in Rogers, 405. 7. Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men (New York Harper Perennial, 1992), 179.

The Structure of Hawthornes Young Goodman Brown Essay -- Young Goodma

new-fangled Goodman Brown the Structure Q. D. Leavis in Hawthorne as Poet mentions Nathaniel Hawthornes Young Goodman Brown as fundamentally dramatic The first batch of works I specified including Young Goodman Brown is essentially dramatic, its use of language is poetic, and it is symbolic, and richly so, as is the dramatic poets. . . (27) This study will examine this and other features of the structure of Hawthornes short story. Leavis evaluation of the storys structure as essentially dramatic is consistent with the take hold of expressed by Clarice Swisher in Nathaniel Hawthorne a Biography. She states Biographers and critics of Nathaniel Hawthorne mustiness deal with opposites determination and self- suspect, imagery of light and dark, flowers and weeds paradoxes (13). Swishers opposites and Leavis essentially dramatic are the like concept, in the estimation of this reader. Lets examine the text to see evidence of this notice how the opposites say their lines in the fashion of a drama dearest heart, whispered she, softly and rather sadly, when her lips were close to his ear, prythee, put off your journey until sunrise, and sleep in your own bed tonight. A lone woman is tumultuous with such dreams and such thoughts, that shes afeard of herself, sometimes. Pray, tarry with me this night, dear husband, of all nights in the year My love and my Faith, replied young Goodman Brown, of all nights in the year, this one night must I tarry away from thee. My journey, as thou callest it, forth and back again, must needs be done twixt now and sunrise. What, my sweet, pretty wife, dost thou doubt me already, and we but three months married ... ...n Brown, including the time-frame, the use of foreshadowing, suspenseful incidents, the dramatic aspect, the climax and denouement. WORKS CITED Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms, 7th ed. New York Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999. Hawthorne, Nathaniel. Young Goodman Brown. 1835. http//www .cwrl.utexas.edu/daniel/amlit/goodman/goodmantext.html Kaul, A.N. Introduction. In Hawthorne A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by A.N. Kaul. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1966. Leavis, Q.D. Hawthorne as Poet. In Hawthorne A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by A.N. Kaul. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1966. Swisher, Clarice. Nathaniel Hawthorne a Biography. In Readings on Nathaniel Hawthorne, edited by Clarice Swisher. San Diego, CA Greenhaven Press, 1996.

History of Marriage Law Essay -- Essays Papers

annals of Marriage Law While abortion law is a lot more univocal and the patterns are obvious, marriage law in the United States is a bit more complicated.-English common law, and early American law, before the 1820s treated marriages like job mergers. The fathers paid dowries and often arranged marriages for their daughters. In the early 1800s fathers could contract their daughters to marriage as early as age 12 and there was no consent on her part. Boys had to be 14 before they could enter into a marriage contract.-The age at which a woman could enter into marriage in the mid-nineteenth one C varied widely from state to state, and therefore a timeline of laws is very difficult to accomplish. -Throughout the 19th century and the early 20th century the age at which women could leg eachy marry rose slowly to anywhere from 16-18 years of age by the mid 20th century. -States differed widely on what rights women had in a marriage. Until 1873 women had absolutely no claim to custody of their children unless proof of abuse of the children was offered and corroborated.-This is about the time that women began to get property rights as well in some states. The responsibilities that came with these rights, however, were huge and not all told states were universal in their protection of a womans property. If a woman did own anything, she had the legal obligation to use it to support completely any illegitimate children, all of her children from her marriage, her husband, her grandchildren, and her parents. So if any of these people asked her to support them she could not legally refuse.-Coming into World War I women could not divorce a husband for adultery, even though he could divorce his wife for the ... ...d so much about the decision, about the issue, and about the legality that reproductive choice makes even more sense to me forthwith than it did originally. I recommend that anyone very interested in the issue of choice read the decision and look into the Gr iswold case and the issue of Right to Privacy. BibliographyAbout.com Womens History Comstock Law. visible(prenominal) online at www.about.com.About.com Womens History Man and Wife available online at www.about.comBlackmun, Supreme Court Justice. Majority Decision in the Case of Roe v. Wade.Delivered January 22, 1973.Brief History of the Emergence of the Crime of Rape available online at Hansel.mnstate.edu/classes/CJ400/Monograph/Oldlaw21.htmlHistory of Marriage available online at www.2-in-2-1co.uk/university/brhistory/index2.htmlSchwartz, Bernard. A History of the Supreme Court. 1993.

Summary of Educating Rita :: essays research papers

Main characters are Frank who is a university lecturer and Rita who is a hair dresser. Rita wants to be educated she decides to take an Open University course. The of import theme of the play is to be educated. At the start of the scene we hear a conversation between Frank and someone else on the other lay off of the phone. We hear him arguing if he will go to the pub or not. What do u mean I determined to go to the pub? I dont need determination to go to the pub. This shows his sarcasm. Showing that he doesnt care this shows us that he doesnt care close his partner and hes a caring person. Frank also doesnt want to teach at Open University he only does it for the money. He thinks there is no point in teaching Open University because all his students will be stupid. Some silly womans attempt to become into the mind of Henry James this shows he is prejudice before he starts teaching. He thinks she is going to be stupid because she didnt survive enough education. He is only doi ng this for the money. He doesnt care slightly the job, all wants is the money to go to the pub.Then we see Rita enter the room. She barges through the room because its jammed. She doesnt use the correct grammar. Im comin in arent I. She speaks in colloquial English, this makes us think that she doesnt have a swell education and shows that she is working class. She speaks in a scouse accent, she swears a lot showing that she doesnt care about offending anyone, and she is loud and enthusiastic about learning. She wants to learn because she wants a change. When Rita tries to get into the room she cant because the handle is jammed .she manages to open it and barge in. its the stupid bleeding handleyou wanna get that fixed. She doesnt wait around to fix the problems she gets them done. She isnt lazy she wants to move things along like in look. Rita doesnt like her life so instead of waiting around she decides to change it and get educated. She is trying to get better in life bu t she has to struggle to get something in life you have to work hard. Whereas frank is ignoring his problems and is drinking instead of trying to fix his problems.

OBriens Things They Carried Essay: Experiences and Emotions :: Things They Carried Essays

Experiences and Emotions in The Things They Carried Tim OBriens The Things They Carried is not a novel about the Vietnam War. It is a history about the soldiers and their experiences and emotions that are brought about from the war (King 182). OBrien makes several statements about war through these dynamic characters. He shows the violent nature of soldiers under the pressures of war, he makes an impressive antiwar statement, and he comments on the reversal of a social deviation into the norm. By skillfully employing the stylistic technique of specific, conscious detail selection and utilizing connotative diction, OBrien thoroughly and convincingly makes each point. The violent nature that the soldiers acquired during their tour in Vietnam is one of OBriens predominant themes in his novel. By consciously selecting very descriptive details that introduce the drastic change in manner within the men, OBrien creates within the reader an understanding of the transactions of war on its participants. One of the soldiers, Norman Bowler, otherwise a very gentle person, carried a Thumb. . .The Thumb was dark brown, rubbery to touch. . . It had been cut from a VC corpse, a boy of fifteen or sixteen(OBrien 13). Bowler had been a very good-natured person in civilian life, yet war makes him into a very hard-mannered, emotionally devoid soldier, carrying about a severed riffle as a trophy, proud of his kill. The transformation shown through Bowler is an excellent indicator of the psychological and emotional change that most of the soldiers undergo. To bring an innocent youthfulness man from sensitive to apathetic, from caring to hateful, requires a great force the war provides this force. However, frequently are the changes more drastic. A soldier named Ted Lavender adopted an orphaned puppy. . .Azar strapped it to a Claymore antipersonnel mine and squeezed the firing device(OBrien 39). Azar has become demented to kill a puppy that someone else has adopted is ho rrible. However, the infliction of violence has become the norm of behavior for these men the fleeting moment of compassion shown by one man is instantly erased by another, setting order affirm within the group. OBrien here shows a hint of sensitivity among the men to set up a startling contrast between the past and the present for these men. The effect produced on the reader by this contrast is one of horror therefore fulfilling OBriens purpose, to convince the reader of wars severely negative effects.

OBriens Things They Carried Essay: Experiences and Emotions :: Things They Carried Essays

Experiences and Emotions in The Things They Carried Tim OBriens The Things They Carried is not a novel about the Vietnam War. It is a story about the soldiers and their experiences and emotions that are brought about from the war (King 182). OBrien makes several statements about war through these dynamic characters. He shows the violent nature of soldiers under the pressures of war, he makes an effective antiwar statement, and he comments on the reversal of a social deviation into the norm. By skillfully employing the stylistic technique of specific, conscious detail selection and utilizing implicit diction, OBrien thoroughly and convincingly makes each point. The violent nature that the soldiers acquired during their tour in Vietnam is one of OBriens predominant themes in his novel. By consciously selecting very descriptive expand that reveal the drastic change in manner within the men, OBrien creates within the reader an understanding of the effects of war on its participan ts. One of the soldiers, Norman bowler hat, other than a very gentle person, carried a Thumb. . .The Thumb was dark brown, rubbery to touch. . . It had been cut from a VC corpse, a boy of fifteen or sixteen(OBrien 13). Bowler had been a very good-natured person in civilian life, yet war makes him into a very hard-mannered, emotionally devoid soldier, carrying about a part finger as a trophy, proud of his kill. The transformation shown through Bowler is an excellent indicator of the psychological and emotional change that most of the soldiers undergo. To bring an truthful young man from sensitive to apathetic, from caring to hateful, requires a great force the war provides this force. However, frequently are the changes more drastic. A soldier named Ted Lavender select an orphaned puppy. . .Azar strapped it to a Claymore antipersonnel mine and squeezed the firing device(OBrien 39). Azar has become demented to kill a puppy that someone else has adopted is horrible. However, the p ainful sensation of violence has become the norm of behavior for these men the fleeting moment of compassion shown by one man is instantly erased by another, setting erect back within the group. OBrien here shows a hint of sensitivity among the men to set up a startling contrast between the past and the usher for these men. The effect produced on the reader by this contrast is one of horror therefore fulfilling OBriens purpose, to convince the reader of wars severely negative effects.