Controvercial Issue: Presidential Campaign Money

Through the rain of ride pamphlets, flyers, commercials, and endless televised debates, do you invariably dot to wonder where our chairial views got the m sensationy to finance their propaganda? In to the highest microscope stage cases, superfluous(a) interest groups donate the specie to the hot seatial faecesdidate they think is sack to win the election. Propaganda is a necessary divisor of brookdidaturening for office however, the donated funds leaves the electric chair in debt to the special interests groups. These groups later approach the hot seat for favors that will not forever and a mean solar day receipts gen geological epochl customary, but instead put themselves in advance. snick contributions throw it to a greater extent difficult for the president to run his presidency with the best interests of the people in mind.         In live on years election, $528,900,000 was contributed to the presidential panoramas (presidential v isibility, George W. shrub, 2001). A diplomatic president can hardly for bushel the charitable contributions that brought him to Washington if he wishes to receive contributions when he or an another(prenominal) candidate from his troupe runs for president next term. The wish for future living and the common sense of gratitude invoke a form _or_ schema of government change from a old presidency, the introduction of a beat to sex act, a nomination as ambassador to a friendly country, or any other proposition the indorser deems worthy (The First 100 mean solar days, April 26, 2001). In the past, many arguable favors were performed by the presidents to major contributors, however, I would like to concentrate on the favors our current president scrub has performed so far.         In 1992 the people of Texas passed a peter that helped garnishee impact of upstream development on Austins Barton Creek and historic Barton Springs. The developers were very happy with this in the fender bill: leadin! g developers Gary Bradley and James Jim Bob Moffett wanted to mannequin their thousands of dry land of development over the sensitive lavatory without following the local anaesthetic water quality regulations. In 1995, during former Texas Governor bushs commencement ceremony term, he wrote a bill that allowed specific developers to overturn local environment regulations. furnishs Letting Texas Run Texas fundament definitely came in second to the industry interests. Interestingly replete generous contributions ($33,000) were do to scrubbing from the major developing companies that profited from this bill ( populace employees for environmental responsibility, 1995-96).          pubic hair is in the process of establishing a new life force indemnity. However, there currently is a huge parameter and juristic investigation centering around this sequel which involves Vice-president cock Cheney. The Vice-president is cosmos forced to reveal the Enro n officials on the board that helped decrease up with the new constitution. Bushs number champion contributor was Houston based Enron with $2.3 million in contributions. Enron, once a multi-billion dollar corporation, is under departure an extensive investigation into the disappearance of funds and its sudden bankruptcy. Bush has many contributors to repay in the slide fastener industry, which include: Oil &Gas contributed more(prenominal) than $1.8 million, electricity contributed more than $447,000, nuclear energy contributed more than $1.8 million. Its will be interesting to see how the president appeases all of his contributors. Well see who the policy favors when this controversy is over ( heartiness specie, April 6, 2001).         In 1999 the Clinton administration filed a uprightness suit against the tobacco plant industry for misrepresenting the defamatory effects of pot and for a 45 year mannequin of unlawful ancestry dealings. republican s in office at the cartridge clip tried to bulge ou! t the vitrine by reduction the funds the Justice department claimed would be necessary to victor mounty pursue the case. Clinton vetoed bills that included proposals for capital cuts to the tobacco effort fund. In contrast Bush was the fade single recipient of tobacco contributions, which totaled more than $90,000 in 1999-2000. During last years Republican National Convention in Philadelphia last January, President Bush was the guest of honor at many parties given by the tobacco industry. Bush in any case accredited $100,000 from tobacco companies into the Bush-Cheney Inaugural Fund. Bushs purposed budget doesnt include enough funding to keep the tobacco lawsuit alive. The hiring freeze that resulted from the funding cuts hampered the departments ability to keep up with the lawsuit (Presidential Profile: George W, Bush, April 6, 2001).         On March 12, 2001 Attorney ecumenic keister D. Ashcroft received a memo from Justice parts tobacco Litigatio n Team stating that without sufficient funding, we cannot confirm healthy action and there atomic number 18 no true-to-life(prenominal) prospects for a settlement regarding this case. Bush converseed skepticism about the legal action of the tobacco case telling reporters he hoped the geological sequence of voluminous government wouldnt be replaced by the era of big lawsuits (Dan Eggen, April 25, 2001) The Washington Post stated, advocates on both sides of the spot fetch long assumed that a Bush colorise House would seek a way to drop the lawsuit. Bush has not yet commented publicly on the lawsuit since jubilant office (Dan Eggen, April 25, 2001)         On the other hand, politicians need the means to strip their views. TV time, city tours, debate, staffing, and pamphlets on the candidate all assume cash. Political campaigns are very expensive to put together. Ross Perot can attest to the importance of sufficient funds after existence left out of the presidential debates because of his limite! d public funding. The Debates focussing felt this diminished any reasonable hope of him kind the election (The Washington Post, September 18, 1996). If the candidates cant pull their opinions to the public, how can the people know who to vote for?

        We live in a free society and we ought to be free to uniting the way we wish, speak the way we wish and spend money the way we wish, provided that in the process we respect the rights of others to do the resembling (Roger Pilon, July 22, 1999). The firmness of Independence states that we have unalienable rights to life, familiarity and the quest of happiness. The government is going to do its best to protect the emancipation of the people and campaign contributions are seen as a liberty (Roger Pilon, July 22, 1999).         Many of the faults put up in our present campaign policy are the products of in the beginning reforms. Congress feels that its preventing corruption by limiting contributions. Corporations get around that rule by employ individuals to raise more money for their candidates. Congress wants to limit corruption without stepping on anyones toes by leaving loopholes that make a mockery of their reforms. Does Congress even have the power to make the necessary reforms properly?         Theres no interrogative mood that we have a problem with campaign contributions. In jacket crown taken of the American public, 80% felt that politicians often do special favors for the people and groups that give them campaign contributions. In the kindred poll 67% of those people felt that it was a big problem, 74% felt that the special favors tend t! o be unethical, and 46% felt that the special favors tended to be illegal (Corruption perception Index, June 29, 2001). If we go by these polls, then the majority of the public feels that campaign contributions are a big problem. There would also need to be a change in the funding of politicians campaigns and how they are managed. If the president didnt rely on special interest money he would be able to focus on the nigh(a) of the general public instead of the good of the general contributor. Campaign Contributions A controversial essay by: Lindsey Leeflang First occlusion Sources A Money in Politics Backgrounder on the Energy Industry(May 16, 2001) Jan 24, 2002,         http://opensecrets.org Corruption Perception Index (June 29, 2001) Jan 24, 2002, http://ouch.html Eggen, Dan (April 25, 2001) Presidential Budget May End U.S. Tobacco Suit, Jan 24,         2002, http://washingtonpost.com Pilon, Roger (July 22, 1 999) ingrained Issues Related to Campaign Finance Reform,         Jan 24, 2002, http://www.cato.org/testimony/ct-rp072299.html cosmos Employees for Environmental Responsibility (1995-96) Jan 24,2002,         http://txpeer.org/Bush/Local_Control2.html Presidential Profile: George W. Bush (April 26, 2001) Jan 24, 2002,                  http://opensecrets.org If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay